top of page

When Digital Luxury Backfires: The NFT Paradox in Sustainable Fashion

When Digital Luxury Backfires: The NFT Paradox in Sustainable Fashion
Teramy Academy

Gucci, Dolce & Gabbana, and Balmain have all rushed into NFTs, betting that blockchain-authenticated digital ownership represents the future of luxury. The promise is compelling: exclusive digital experiences that reduce environmental footprints while maintaining the prestige and scarcity luxury brands depend on. But new research reveals a troubling paradox. When consumers view a product as highly sustainable, adding NFTs can actually undermine brand credibility and reduce purchase likelihood.


This counterintuitive finding should give pause to any marketing executive considering an NFT strategy. The technology that brands hoped would signal innovation and environmental responsibility can backfire precisely when sustainability matters most to consumers.


NFTs sustainable fashion: The hybrid format wins

Analysis of consumer responses to three product formats (physical only, NFT only, and digital twins combining both) reveals a clear winner. Digital twins consistently generated the highest purchase intent across luxury backpacks, jackets, and sunglasses. These hybrid offerings outperformed both traditional physical products and purely digital NFTs.

The logic is straightforward. Digital twins preserve the tangible reassurance consumers expect from luxury goods while offering innovative digital ownership. Consumers get the craftsmanship and sensory experience of a physical item plus exclusive digital access, authentication, and virtual wearability. This combination delivers on two fronts: maintaining traditional luxury cues while signaling technological sophistication.


Pure NFT offerings, by contrast, struggled. Without physical anchoring, they failed to convey the quality signals and emotional attachment consumers associate with luxury. Across three experiments involving 478 US consumers, NFT-only products consistently generated the lowest purchase likelihood, even among digitally savvy participants.


Sustainability creates a legitimacy trap

The second finding cuts deeper. Perceived product sustainability doesn't just influence purchase decisions directly, it fundamentally changes how consumers interpret NFT initiatives. When sustainability perceptions are low or moderate, NFTs have minimal impact on brand credibility. But when consumers view a product as highly sustainable, NFTs trigger skepticism that erodes brand legitimacy.


The mechanism operates through perceived incongruence. Consumers who care deeply about environmental impact notice the contradiction between sustainability claims and NFT technology, which remains associated with blockchain energy consumption despite recent improvements. Even though Ethereum's shift to proof-of-stake reduced energy use by 99%, the reputational damage lingers.


This means luxury brands face a legitimacy trap. The products most credibly positioned as sustainable become the riskiest contexts for NFT integration. A jacket marketed for its eco-friendly materials and ethical production loses credibility when paired with NFT authentication. Consumers detect what they perceive as greenwashing, and trust collapses.

The data confirms this pattern. Among consumers with high sustainability perceptions, NFT integration reduced brand legitimacy, which in turn significantly lowered purchase likelihood. The indirect effect was substantial and statistically robust. Among consumers with low or moderate sustainability perceptions, no such effect emerged.


What marketing leaders should do

These findings carry clear implications. First, stop treating NFTs as universally beneficial add-ons. They work in specific contexts and fail in others. Digital twins offer the safest entry point because they preserve physical value while adding digital innovation. Brands should prioritize hybrid formats over pure NFT offerings.


Second, carefully audit sustainability positioning before deploying NFTs. Products with strong environmental credentials become liability zones for blockchain integration unless the technology story is bulletproof. Brands must communicate blockchain choices explicitly, highlighting low-energy protocols and demonstrating environmental net benefits through lifecycle analysis.


Third, recognize that sustainability-conscious consumers scrutinize technological choices more carefully than others. These consumers don't accept innovation for its own sake. They demand coherence between environmental claims and operational reality. Misalignment triggers backlash.


Fourth, use transparency as a strategic asset. Brands that openly discuss energy-efficient blockchain protocols, carbon offset programs, and comparative environmental impact can neutralize skepticism. Silence breeds suspicion. Documentation builds credibility.

The luxury fashion industry stands at a crossroads. NFTs and digital twins offer genuine opportunities to reduce material consumption while maintaining exclusivity and symbolic value. Digital ownership can replace resource-intensive physical production in certain contexts. But execution matters enormously.


Brands that rush into NFTs without addressing sustainability coherence risk destroying the legitimacy they've built. The technology that promises to revolutionize luxury consumption will only deliver if deployed strategically, with careful attention to environmental positioning and consumer perception.


The path forward requires nuance. Digital twins work. Pure NFTs struggle. Sustainability positioning creates both opportunity and risk. Marketing leaders who understand these dynamics can harness dematerialization effectively. Those who don't may find their innovation efforts generating exactly the opposite of their intended effect.


Original Article: Massi, Marta, Andrea Vocino, Chiara Piancatelli, Paola Cillo, and Anna Claudia Pellicelli. "Revolutionizing consumption: Unveiling the Allure of NFTs and digital twins for sustainable luxury fashion." Journal of Business Research 202 (2026): 115757. (Article Link)


Disclaimer: The content on this website is for marketing innovation and education purposes only and should not be considered investment advice.


Follow us

Teramy Academy

Comments

bottom of page